Logo-aim
Arch Iran Med. 2025;28(6): 347-355.
doi: 10.34172/aim.34218
  Abstract View: 61
  PDF Download: 40

Original Article

Clinicopathological Perspectives of Liver Mass Biopsies: A Single Center Experience of 406 Cases

Ömer Atmış 1* ORCID logo, Hanife Seda Mavili 1 ORCID logo, Fatma Seher Pehlivan 1 ORCID logo, Ahmet Burak Ağaoğlu 2 ORCID logo, Atike Pınar Erdoğan 2 ORCID logo, Mustafa Faraşat 3 ORCID logo, Semin Ayhan 1 ORCID logo

1 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
2 Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
3 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
*Corresponding Author: Ömer Atmış, Email: omeratmis@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background: The increasing use of imaging techniques has led to a rise in the detection of liver masses, making it crucial to accurately diagnose their nature. While advances in radiology have reduced the need for liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), biopsy remains essential fo r diagnosing various liver lesions, including metastatic tumors. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic role of liver core needle biopsies, with a particular focus on identifying the primary tumor in cases of liver metastases with an unknown primary.

Methods: We reviewed a total of 406 liver core needle biopsies performed for liver masses between 2017 and 2022. Clinical, radiological, histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) data for primary and metastatic tumors were evaluated.

Results: Of the 406 liver biopsy cases, a significant portion were diagnosed as metastatic lesions, with common primary sites identified as gastrointestinal (GI), lung, and breast cancers. IHC markers showed varying positivity rates across different tumor types, with GATA-3, CDX2, and TTF1 proving particularly useful in distinguishing the tumor origin. While some markers were highly specific, others exhibited variable expression, highlighting the complexity of diagnosing metastatic tumors with unknown primaries.

Conclusion: Liver biopsy remains a crucial diagnostic tool in identification of primary and metastatic liver tumors, especially when the primary site is unknown. IHC analysis enhances the accuracy of diagnosis, though it should be used in conjunction with clinical and radiological data. This study underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing liver masses, with further research needed to optimize diagnostic strategies and improve patient outcomes.



Cite this article as: Atmış Ö, Mavili HS, Pehlivan FS, Ağaoğlu AB, Erdoğan AP, Faraşat M, et al. Clinicopathological perspectives of liver mass biopsies: a single center experience of 406 cases. Arch Iran Med. 2025;28(6):347-355. doi: 10.34172/aim.34218
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 62

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 40

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 11 Mar 2025
Revision: 12 Apr 2025
Accepted: 20 Apr 2025
ePublished: 01 Jun 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)