Logo-aim
Arch Iran Med. 2021;24(3): 218-223.
doi: 10.34172/aim.2021.33

Scopus ID: 85105050358
  Abstract View: 1849
  PDF Download: 932

Original Article

Comparison of the Positive Rate and Diagnostic Value of Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Small Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Xiaoling Ye 1, Yuting Liao 1, Tao Deng 1*

1 Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Tao Deng, MD; Zhangzhidong Road number 9; Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University; Wuhan, Hubei; China; 430060; Tele: +86 13237102137; Email: , Email: dengtao1323@163.com

Abstract

Background: Capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) have provided great help in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases (SBD). The aim of this study was to explore the positive rate and diagnostic value of CE and DBE for patients who were suspected of having SBD, and to make a comparison between the two methods.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the cases at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. We divided the patients into CE and DBE group, and recorded the basic characteristics of the patients, checking the results of CE and DBE, positive rate, sensitivity and specificity for statistical analysis.
Results: A total of 244 patients were included in our research, including 122 in the CE group and 122 in the DBE group. The positive rate of CE for intestinal diseases was 84.4%, higher than that of DBE (78.7%), but DBE (75.2% and 92.3%) had higher sensitivity and specificity than CE (70.5% and 88.2%), though the differences were not statistically significant. The three most common positive findings in patients were inflammation, erosion, or ulcers (28.7%), vascular malformations (14.3%), and eminence lesions (9.0%). CE had a higher rate detection of inflammation, erosion, or ulcers than DBE (36.1% vs 21.3%), but they both had high positive rates for vascular malformations (13.9% and 14.8%). In addition, both methods had higher positive rates in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding compared to other symptoms.
Conclusion: CE and DBE are both important methods for intestinal examination. Patients can choose appropriate tests according to their condition.

Cite this article as: Ye X, Liao Y, Deng T. Comparison of the positive rate and diagnostic value of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in small bowel disease: a retrospective cohort analysis. Arch Iran Med. 2021;24(3):218–223. doi: 10.34172/ aim.2021.33.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1850

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 932

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 02 Jun 2020
Accepted: 02 Jan 2021
ePublished: 01 Mar 2021
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)