﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Academy of Medical Sciences of I.R. Iran</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Archives of Iranian Medicine</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>1029-2977</Issn>
      <Volume>14</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2011</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <DAY>01</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Evaluation of Fast-ELISA versus Standard-ELISA to Diagnose Human Fasciolosis</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>18</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>21</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad Taghi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Rahimi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Kayhan</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ashrafi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Soheyla</FirstName>
        <LastName>Koosha</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Jahangir</FirstName>
        <LastName>Abdi</LastName>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad Bagher</FirstName>
        <LastName>Rokni</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">
      </ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
    </History>
    <Abstract>BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare a fast-ELISA (F-ELISA) method versus standard-ELISA (S-ELISA) to diagnose human fasciolosis.  METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 35 individuals infected with fasciolosis, 27 infected with other parasitoses and 22 from healthy people. The samples were examined with S-ELISA (30-minute incubation periods) and F-ELISA (10-minute incubation periods) for total antibody response against fasciolosis.  RESULTS: The optimum conditions for S-ELISA and F-ELISA were respectively as follows: antigen 10 and 5 µg/mL, sera 1:500 dilution for both, peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG diluted 1:7000 and 1:10000. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 11.0. Cut-off vale for S-ELISA and F-ELISA was determined as 0.56 and 0.42, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity; positive, and negative predictive values were detected as 97.2%, 100%, 94.6%, and 95.6% for both tests.  CONCLUSION: Cut-off values, sensitivity, specificity, and other important parameters of the two evaluated tests determined that the F-ELISA method could be used with no detectable difference.</Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>