Logo-aim
Arch Iran Med. 2025;28(10): 584-591.
doi: 10.34172/aim.34648
  Abstract View: 50
  PDF Download: 37

Original Article

Prognostic Analysis of VEGF, CRP and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Interventional Embolization for Primary Liver Cancer

Zheng Dong 1* ORCID logo, Kehui Tong 1 ORCID logo, Yingjie Wu 1, Mengxiao Lu 1

1 Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated People’s Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
*Corresponding Author: Zheng Dong, Email: yukk39d@sina.com

Abstract

Background: To examine the predictive significance of C-reactive protein (CRP), contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in interventional chemoembolization of primary liver cancer.

Methods: A total of 277 patients with primary liver cancer, 162 males and 115 females, aged 41-73 years, were selected from January 2020 to January 2023 in our hospital. These patients received hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Correlations of VEGF, CRP and contrast-enhanced ultrasound with the progression of TACE within two years were observed. Interventional embolization, comparable preoperative serum VEGF and CRP tests and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative data were used, with the BCLC criteria being stage B, Child‒Pugh grades A‒B, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0‒1. VEGF was assessed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and CRP was assessed via immunoturbidimetry. Blood was collected at a proximal time point before embolization. CEUS was used to intravenously inject the contrast agent under low mechanical index conditions to obtain dynamic curves of the artery, portal vein and delay period. The ROIs of the lesion and control areas were selected. Two trained radiologists independently measured peak intensity, time to peak, lavage rate and area under the curve in a blinded manner, and the average value was taken for analysis. The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival, and the secondary outcomes were the objective response rate and disease control rate at 4–8 weeks after surgery. Candidate variable screening was performed via LASSO, a multivariate Cox model was constructed to evaluate prognosis, the proportional hazards hypothesis was tested and processed, and landmark and time-dependent covariate analyses were used for early postoperative indicators.

Results: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound revealed that the maximum tumor tissue strength (IMAX) was 158.74 ± 43.67% and 185.72 ± 51.47% in the progressive and non-progressive groups, respectively. The maximum strength difference between the tumor and parenchyma (IMAX T-P) was 52.18 ± 9.17% (84.52 ± 10.82%), and the tumor tissue ascent times were 8.32 ± 2.85 s and 15.03 ± 6.85 s. The clearance times (WTs) were 12.23 ± 5.14 and 23.05 ± 11.47 s, and the TTP times of the maximum tumor strength were 10.32 ± 3.48 s and 17.05 ± 6.05 s. RT 1, RT t-p, TTP 1, and TTP t-p were not significantly correlated with tumor progression (P>0.05). Two groups of patients had conventional VEGF levels [(342.3+/- 72.9, 183.6+/- 62.5 pg /mL] and CRP levels [(19.7+/- 6.8, 11.4+/- 7.3 mg/L], and the difference between before and after comparison [(+/- 33.4, 43.7 to 65.8+/- 71.5) pg /mL, (5.1+/- 4. 2, -3.8 ± 4.0 mg/L], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of VEGF, CRP and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the prediction of TACE has potential prognostic application value.



Cite this article as: Dong Z, Tong K, Wu Y, Lu M. Prognostic analysis of VEGF, CRP and contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with interventional embolization for primary liver cancer. Arch Iran Med. 2025;28(10):584-591. doi: 10.34172/aim.34648
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 51

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 37

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 09 Jun 2025
Revision: 21 Aug 2025
Accepted: 21 Sep 2025
ePublished: 01 Oct 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)