Logo-aim
Arch Iran Med. 2025;28(3): 162-170.
doi: 10.34172/aim.33513
  Abstract View: 7
  PDF Download: 9

Original Article

Weight Management Processes and Individual Differences: A Validation Study of P-Weight and S-Weight in Farsi

Zahra Gohari Dezfuli 1,2 ORCID logo, Minoo Hasan Rashedi 1,3 ORCID logo, Mina Araminejad 1 ORCID logo, Keyvan Karimi 1,4 ORCID logo, Ensieh Sadat Mansouri 5, Tohid Seif Barghi 1 ORCID logo, Amir-Hossein Memari 1* ORCID logo

1 Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Amir-Hossein Memari, Email: memari_ah@tums.ac.ir

Abstract

Background: The obesity epidemic is a growing public health concern, making weight management a crucial aspect of overall health and well-being. Indeed, effective tools to facilitate behavior change are essential for achieving long-term success in managing weight. This study aimed to validate the Farsi versions of the S-weight and P-weight questionnaires to support personalized weight management by assessing specific aspects of psychological readiness, including motivation, self-regulation, emotional reappraisal (EmR), and environmental restructuring (EnR).

Methods: A cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires was conducted. The study included 455 adults aged 17–65, excluding those undergoing invasive weight-loss interventions. The measured variables included EmR, weight consequence evaluation (WCE), weight management actions (WMA), and EnR, which were assessed using structured Likert-scale questionnaires. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, with reliability evaluated via Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results: The questionnaires showed strong validity and reliability (KMO=0.91; Bartlett’s test χ2=3999.75; P<0.001). Overweight and obese participants scored significantly higher in change processes than normal-weight participants (P<0.001).

Conclusion: The validated instruments provide a reliable means of tailoring weight management strategies based on psychological readiness, potentially improving long-term outcomes.



Cite this article as: Gohari Dezfuli Z, Hasan Rashedi M, Araminejad M, Karimi K, Mansouri ES, Seif Barghi T, et al. Weight management processes and individual differences: a validation study of P-weight and S-weight in Farsi. Arch Iran Med. 2025;28(3):162-170. doi: 10.34172/aim.33513
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 8

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 9

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 18 Nov 2024
Revision: 03 Dec 2024
Accepted: 05 Feb 2025
ePublished: 01 Mar 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)