Logo-aim
Arch Iran Med. 2022;25(12): 779-787.
doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.123
PMID: 37543905
PMCID: PMC10685844
Scopus ID: 85158858608
  Abstract View: 891
  PDF Download: 428

Original Article

Validity of Body Image Pictogram to Determine Overweight/Obesity in Adults from Less Developed Populations: Results From Pars Cohort Study

Somayeh Bazdar 1 ORCID logo, Mohammad Hossein Sharifi 2, Hossein Puostchi 3, Abdullah Gandomkar 4, Reza Malekzadeh 3, Fatemeh Malekzadeh 5, Hossein Molavi Vardanjani 6* ORCID logo

1 MPH Department, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3 Liver, Pancreatic, and Biliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Non-Communicable Disease Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
5 Digestive Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6 MPH Department, School of Medicine, Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Hossein Molavi Vardanjani,, Email: hosseinmolavi@ymail.com

Abstract

Background: Despite the evidence for validity of body image pictogram (BIP) to discriminate overweight, obese, and normal individuals, there is little evidence on the probable effect of socio-demographic variables on its validity. To investigate the effects of socioeconomic status (SES), age, ethnicity, and educational level on the validity of BIP to discriminate normal weight, overweight, and obese people.

Methods: We used the Pars Cohort Study (PCS) data. Stunkard’s BIP score was used as test measure. Participants were classified as normal (body mass index [BMI]<25), overweight (BMI=25 to 29.9), and obese (BMI≥29.9) based on their BMI (kg/m2 ). Area under curve (AUC) and its 95% CI were estimated and compared. Optimal cutoff points and their sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio were reported.

Results: A total of 9232 participants with a female/male ratio of 1.03 were included. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 37.4% and 18.2%, respectively. Regardless of socio-demographic levels, the optimal cut-points to discriminate normal BMI from overweight, and overweight from obese participants were BIP score of four and five, respectively. Estimated AUC correlated with ethnicity (P<0.001) for both genders, and with SES for females (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Although BIP may be a valid measure to categorize the general adult population into normal, overweight and obese, its validity depends on SES and ethnicity. BIP may be available as a proxy measure for BMI categories in socio-demographically homogeneous populations but not in heterogeneous populations.


Cite this article as: Bazdar S, Sharifi MH, Puostchi H, Gandomkar A, Malekzadeh R, Malekzadeh F, et al. Validity of body image pictogram to determine overweight/obesity in adults from less developed populations: Results from Pars Cohort Study. Arch Iran Med. 2022;25(12):779-787. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.123
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 892

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 428

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 10 Jul 2021
Revision: 28 Dec 2021
Accepted: 08 Jan 2022
ePublished: 01 Dec 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)