Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(11): 680-685.
PMID: 29480732
Scopus ID: 85042091439
  Abstract View: 2791
  PDF Download: 1714

Original Article

How to Assess Quality of Research in Iran, From Input to Impact? Introduction of Peer-Based Research Evaluation Model in Iran

Asghar Ebadifar 1,2, Monir Baradaran Eftekhari 1*, Parviz Owlia 3, Elham Habibi 1, Elham Ghalenoee 1, Mohammad Reza Bagheri 1, Katayoun Falahat 1, Masoumeh Eltemasi 1, Zahra Sobhani 1, Shahin Akhondzadeh 1,4

1 Deputy of Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
2 Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Molecular Microbiology Research Center (MMRC), Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
4 Psychiatric Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author: Monir Baradaran Eftekhari, 13th Floor, Block A, Deputy for Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-21-81455184, Fax: +98-21-81455184, Email: , Email: mbeftekhari200@gmail.com


Background: Research evaluation is a systematic and objective process to measure relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of research activities, and peer review is one of the most important tools for assessing quality of research. The aim of this study was introducing research evaluation indicators based on peer reviewing.

Methods: This study was implemented in 4 stages. A list of objective-oriented evaluation indicators were designed in 4 axes, including; governance and leadership, structure, knowledge production and research impact.

Results: The top 10% medical sciences research centers (RCs) were evaluated based on peer review. Adequate equipment and laboratory instruments, high quality research publication and national or international cooperation were the main strengths in medical sciences RCs and the most important weaknesses included failure to adhere to strategic plans, parallel actions in similar fields, problems in manpower recruitment, knowledge translation & exchange (KTE) in service providers and policy makers’ levels.

Conclusion: Peer review evaluation can improve the quality of research.

Cite this article as: Ebadifar A, Baradaran Eftekhari M, Owli P, Habibi E, Ghalenoee E, Bagheri MR, et al. How to assess quality of research in iran, from input to impact? Introduction of peer-based research evaluation model in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(11):680–685.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Security code

Abstract View: 2792

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 1714

Your browser does not support the canvas element.