Logo-aim
Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(8): 0.
PMID: 28846012
Scopus ID: 85028621440
  Abstract View: 3249
  PDF Download: 1923

Original Article

Management of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-Related Bile Duct Injuries: A Tertiary Center Experience

Ramazan Saygın Kerimoğlu*, Erdal Birol Bostanci, Tahsin Dalgic, Kerem Karaman, Ali Kemal Kayapinar, Ilter Ozer, Murat Ulas, Yusuf Bayram Ozogul, Musa Akoglu
*Corresponding Author: Email: saygin_k@yahoo.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-related bile duct injuries remains a challenging issue with major implications for patient’s outcome.

METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2012, we retrospectively analyzed the management and treatment outcomes of 90 patients with bile duct injury following LC.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (52.2%) were treated surgically while the remaining 43 patients (47.8%) underwent non-surgical intervention. Injuries of Strasberg Type A and C were significantly more frequent in the non-surgical intervention group (P = 0.016, P = 0.044) whereas Type E2 was more frequent in the definitive surgery group (P < 0.001). The success rate of non-surgical intervention decreased as the waiting time increased whereas the success of definitive surgery was not time-dependent (P = 0.048). Initial jaundice (direct biluribin >1.3 gr/dL) significantly reduced the success rate of non-surgical interventions (P = 0.017). Presence of intraabdominal abscess significantly increased the complication rate after both definitive surgery and non-surgical interventions (P = 0.04, P = 0.023). Treatment success rates were similar in both surgery and non-surgical intervention groups according to the distribution of Strasberg injury types.
CONCLUSION: A multimodality approach is recommended in planning for patient-based treatment. Delayed referral reduces the success of nonsurgical interventions while it does not seem to significantly affect the success of surgical interventions when intraabdominal sepsis is under control.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 3250

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 1923

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

ePublished: 01 Aug 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)