Logo-aim
Arch Iran Med. 2017;20(2): 0.
PMID: 28193082
Scopus ID: 85014922533
  Abstract View: 2900
  PDF Download: 1808

Original Article

Analysis of Previously Verified Fecal and Plasma Dow-regulated MicroRNAs in FFPE Tissue Samples of CRC Patients

Reza Ghanbari, Sama Rezasoltani, Javad Hashemi, Ashraf Mohamadkhani, Arash Tahmasebifar, Ehsan Arefian, Naser Mobarra, Jahanbakhsh Asadi*, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Yaghoub Yazdani, Sakari Knuutila, Reza Malekzadeh
*Corresponding Author: Email: ja_asadi52@yahoo.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis of this neoplasm is critical and may reduce patients’ mortality. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules whose expression pattern can be altered in various diseases such as CRC.

METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the expression levels of miR-142-3p, miR-26a-5p (their reduced expression in plasma samples of CRC patients was previously confirmed), miR-4478 and miR-1295-3p (their reduced expression in stool samples of CRC patients was previously confirmed) in tissue samples of CRC patients in comparison to healthy subjects.
To achieve this purpose, total RNA including small RNA was extracted from 53 CRC and 35 normal subjects’ Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples using the miRNeasy FFPE Mini Kit. The expression levels of these four selected miRNAs were measured using quantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR).
RESULTS: We found that the expression levels of miR-4478 and miR-1295b-3p (two previously down-regulated fecal miRNAs) were significantly decreased in FFPE samples of CRC patients compared to healthy controls. On the other hand, no significant differences were seen in expression levels of miR-142-3p and miR-26a-5p (two previously down-regulated circulating miRNAs) in FFPE samples between these two groups.
CONCLUSION: Regarding current findings, it may be concluded that to diagnose CRC patients based on the miRNAs approach, stool samples are more likely preferable to plasma samples; nevertheless, additional studies with more samples are needed to confirm the results.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 2901

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 1808

Your browser does not support the canvas element.